
When visiting one of The Fitzrovia Chapelโs fascinating exhibitions, you are almost certain to bump into at least one former nurse. At its recent show about health workersโ uniforms, the nurses of course were out in force. In late November over thirty of them joined the same guided tour as I did, led by one of the curators, Freya Bently. Their contribution to the event was tremendous.
They were there because the Chapel was once part of the Middlesex Hospital. In 2008 the hospital was literally demolished around it, leaving it in isolated splendour while a new set of buildings (of questionable aesthetic and social value) was constructed on the site, incorporating what is now called Pearson Square. But we are grateful for small mercies. The Chapel is glorious, and over the years it has been transformed into an interesting arts venue.

The name of the Chapelโs new setting happily commemorates its original designer, John Loughborough Pearson, who created it in 1891-2. It was not until 1929 that work on the interior was completed, overseen by the architectโs son, Frank Loughborough Pearson. The elder Pearson was one of the brightest stars in the firmament of late Victorian Gothic Revival architecture. His son Frank, who was born and lived for a time in Marylebone, was no slouch either. He finished many of his late fatherโs projects, including Truro Cathedral; and designed a large number of structures himself, including the splendid Novello House on Wardour Street.
For Fitzrovians, former Middlesex Hospital Staff, and many casual visitors, the Chapel is the jewel in the crown of our local attractions. And erstwhile Middlesex and UCLH nurses did a lot more than just turn up at the exhibition: they actually helped to create it. Old uniforms were contributed, and conversations about how they were worn and received were set up by curators Bently and Jo Horton.

An excellent small catalogue which accompanied the exhibition supplies many gripping details. Here I will just outline what for me were some of the exhibitionโs highlights.
โI devised this little train so that when you lean over a patient your ankles will be covered, and the students will not be able to see themโ
This somewhat disingenuous remark is attributed to Godiva Marian Thorold, the Matron of the Middlesex from 1870 to 1896. Concern for the moral welfare of young working women was often displayed by the powers-that-be during the great upsurge in womenโs extra-domestic employment in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This can come over as patronising and puritanical. But for me it demonstrates a proper regard for the safety of women who were leaving home to work in the public sector at a time when it was spatially and socially dominated by men. In the Middlesex Hospital, where bodily contact was an inevitable part of the job, it was particularly important.

The photo above shows, from left to right, the outfit worn by Matron Godiva Marian Thorold herself in 1891; and nursesโ uniforms from the First World War, 1914-1918, and from the 1950s. Nursesโ ankles and calves are being gradually uncovered, and are being accepted as less of a danger to all concerned than was previously believed — although it must be said that the popularity of sexual fantasies involving nurses may have been fuelled in part by the emergence of their legs into the light of day. (Other people have similar fantasies about firemen. Itโs the uniforms that do it).

In 1948 the National Health Service was created, and with it came a new uniform, designed by none other than Norman Hartnell, the late Queen Elizabethโs favourite couturier. It was produced in the first place for St Johnโs nurses working overseas, but was approved in 1948 by the General Nursing Council as the uniform for state registered nurses employed by the new NHS. It features a lavender-coloured poplin dress with a pinched-in waist and a full skirt, a pointed white collar, and elaborate frilly cuffs. The non-nurses on our tour thought it was lovely; but the nurses whoโd actually worn it pointed out that the collars were stiff and chafed their necks; and the cuffs were just “ridiculous”.

One of the joys of the exhibition was that visitors were given the opportunity to handle and even to try on some of the items which had been lent by former nurses. This 1980s dress worn in the Royal London Hospital, a practical adaptation of the original Norman Hartnell design, proved a great hit with everybody. Sadly I didnโt have time to go into the changing room with it and discover whether nursing had all along been my true vocation.

My own sartorial interests tend to focus on shoes, so I was a bit disappointed that none of these were included in the exhibition (perhaps because unlike the dresses nurses carried on wearing them after leaving the hospital, and so they wore out). But the nurses in our group reported that black or brown lace-ups were prescribed, depending on whether you were qualified or still studying. Nowadays, they told me, nurses are allowed to wear trainers provided they have laces and cover the whole of the foot. One woman had heard a story about a trainee nurse being sent home when she turned up for work in Doc Martens, despite — as we agreed — these being eminently practical. Perhaps, as was the case with school uniforms in the 1960s, the moment an item of clothing became fashionable, they banned it. Nursesโ stockings were generally beige. Later, when I tried to check online whether nurses had ever been permitted to wear black stockings, I was immediately bombarded with soft porn, so I still donโt know the answer.
โIโm not a uniform person, but itโs a rather nice uniform, and itโs a uniform that I always felt very proud wearingโ — Debra Kroll, Covid Story, personal unpublished account.
The advent of male nurses (1960s), permission for women to wear trousers (1990s), the different colours worn by different grades of hospital workers — these and many other absorbing topics were touched on in the exhibition. Many congratulations to all the people who played a part: I loved it. If youโre a fan of the NHS, of fashion, or of social history, this was the show for you. Itโs finished now, Iโm afraid, but I very much hope that they can bring it back in the not-too-distant future.
Sue Blundell is a playwright and lecturer in Classical Studies. sueblundell.com
Please support The Fitzrovia News. Consider helping us cover our costs by visiting our secure payment page.
Discover more from The Fitzrovia News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



